Beyond the Posts: Understanding Student Discourse on Social Media through Content Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v3i2.758Keywords:
Social Media, Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Content AnalysisAbstract
This paper explores students' use of social media platforms, primarily focusing on Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. Understanding the intricacies of student discourse can inform strategies to enhance digital literacy, foster constructive conversations, and create supportive online environments for academic and personal development. The findings of this study contribute valuable insights into the complex world of student discourse on social media, offering a deeper understanding of the dynamics that influence online interactions. This investigation aimed to understand how students use these platforms, examining engagement patterns and purposes. To achieve this, the researcher employed a qualitative method research approach. The researcher purposefully sampled 90 students from the University of Technology (UoT) in Gauteng, South Africa, to collect data. The participants submitted extracts from Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter texts for analysis. Findings revealed that students could benefit from using Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter for educational purposes since the document analysis indicated education as a prominent topic discussed on all the platforms. Another salient topic that emerged from the data was the topic of social discourse linked with love and relationships.
Downloads
References
Akakandelwa, A & Walubitha, G. (2017). Students' social media use and its perceived impact on their social life: A case study of the University of Zambia. The International Journal of multi-disciplinary Research, 1(1), 1-10.
Ahn, J. (2010). The influence of social network sites on high school students' social and academic development. Master’s thesis. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
Ajjan, H. & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
Balcikanli, C. (2015). Prospective English teachers' experiences on Facebook: Adoption, use and educational use in a Turkish context. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 11(3), 82-99.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086653.pdf.
Bergagna, E & Tartaglia, S. (2018). Self-esteem, social comparison, and Facebook use. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 14(4), 831-845.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329326245_Self-Esteem_Social_Comparison_and_Facebook_Use
Bless, C. Higson-smith, C. & Sithole, S.L. (2013). Fundamentals of social research methods. Hatfield: Van Schaiks Publishers.
Bock, Z. (2013a). Cyber socializing: Emerging genres and registers of intimacy among young South African students. Language Matters, 44(2), 68-91.
Bowen, G.A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3-66.
Franz, D., Marsh, H.E., Chen, J.I. & Teo, A.R. (2019). Using Facebook for Qualitative Research: A Brief Primer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(8), 1-10.
https://www.jmir.org/2019/8/e13544/
Gencer, Z.T. (2016). Visualization of the language in social media: research aimed at using the visual keyboard and punctuation marks. Turkish Studies, 11(8), 361-376.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.9622
Junco, R., Elavsky, C.M. & Heilberger, G. (2013). Putting Twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement, and success: Twitter collaboration and engagement. British journal of educational technology, 44(2), 273-287. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227987730_Putting_twitter_to_the_test_Assessing_outcomes_for_student_collaboration_engagement_and_success
Karahanna, E., Xu, S.X., Xu, Y., & Zhang, N. (2018). The needs – affordances – features perspective for the use of social media. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 737-756.
Karpinski, A.C. (2009). Facebook and Academic Performance. Computers in Human Behavior. 26(1), 1237–1245.
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
Kuppuswamy, S., & Shanker, N. (2010). The Impact of Social Networking Websites on the Education of Youth. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 2(1), 67-79.
Lampe, C., Wohn, D. Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B. & Wash, R. (2011). Students use Facebook to organize collaborative classroom activities. Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 6(1), 329-347.
https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=682754
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-96.
https://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm
McFarlane, G. (2020). How Facebook, Twitter, and Social Media Make Money from You:
Advertising is the key to how social media companies earn revenue. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/032114/how-facebook-twitter-social-media-make-money-you-twtr-lnkd-fb-goog.aspx
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2016). Qualitative Research Designs and Data-Gathering Techniques. Hatfield: Van Schaik Publishers.
Van Loon, A.J., Hüneke, H. & Mulder, T. (2019). The hyperpycnite problem: Comment.
Journal of Palaeogeography. 8(3), 314-320.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tiyiselani Ndukwani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
