Integrating Graphic Design into Library-Based STEAM Education: A Case Study from MTsN 1 Bener Meriah toward Society 5.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37249/jomess.v1i2.1285Keywords:
Library entertainer program, STEAM Center, Graphic design, educational planning, Society 5.0Abstract
This study aims to describe and analyze the planning of the Library Intertainer Program at MTsN 1 Bener Meriah, which adopts a graphic design–based STEAM Center concept. Employing a qualitative descriptive method, this research explores the processes of pre-action planning, implementation, observation, and reflection that constitute each cycle of program development. The participants consisted of teachers and students of MTsN 1 Bener Meriah, selected purposively based on their active involvement in STEAM Center activities.The program’s planning stage began with identifying the initial conditions of the library environment and pedagogical needs. The study emphasizes that program planning serves as a strategic framework to enhance educational quality in the Society 5.0 era through the integration of graphic design within the STEAM paradigm. This approach not only fosters creativity and innovation among students but also aligns educational practices with 21st-century competencies. The research findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how library-based STEAM initiatives can promote interactive, technology-driven, and design-oriented learning environments in secondary education.
References
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Beers, S. Z. (2011). 21st century skills: Preparing students for their future. National Education Association.
Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1114
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: A human-centered society that balances economic advancement with the resolution of social problems. Japan Spotlight, 27(5), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2591729320500104
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Kellam, N. N., & Walther, J. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293
Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for practice. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Deakin University Press.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative.
Mahesta, T. (2021). Manajemen perpustakaan sekolah dalam menunjang kegiatan belajar siswa di rumah (Studi kasus di SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Ponorogo). Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14(1).
Maulana, I. (2022). Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematics (STEAM) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa: Studi meta-analisis (Unpublished master’s thesis).
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mulyani, T. (2019). Pendekatan pembelajaran STEM untuk menghadapi revolusi industri 4.0. Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana, 7(1), 455–460.
Narváez Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese concept for a super-intelligent society. Sustainability, 13(12), 6567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126567
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Quigley, C., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201
Shiroishi, Y., Uchiyama, K., & Suzuki, N. (2018). Society 5.0: For human security and well-being. Computer, 51(7), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3011041
Suganda, E., Latifah, S., Irwandani, I., Sari, P. M., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). STEAM and environment on students’ creative-thinking skills: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012101
Thabroni, G. (2022). Metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif (Konsep & contoh). Serupa.id.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379381
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the U.S. as a practical educational framework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 107
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
