The Contribution of Social Semiotics to Text Understanding in Various Disciplines: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Muhammad Hasyimsyah Batubara STAIN MADINA, Indonesia
  • Meisuri Meisuri Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Amrin Saragih Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v4i1.830

Keywords:

Social Semiotics, Text and Context, Interdisciplinary Understanding

Abstract

-This article investigates the role of social semiotics in enhancing text comprehension across various academic disciplines, addressing a critical gap in interdisciplinary understanding methods. Although previous studies applied social semiotics to specific modes and disciplines, a comprehensive analysis that includes multiple semiotic elements in academic texts remains limited. The objective of this study is to verify how social semiotics can be used to interpret complex, multimodal academic texts, thereby aiding students in diverse fields. By using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, the study analyzes findings from 13 relevant articles sourced from Google Scholar between 2020 and 2024. Key findings highlight that social semiotics facilitates understanding by enabling readers to contextualize and interpret multimodal content such as visual elements, data, and narrative structures unique to each discipline. These insights reveal implications for educators in developing interdisciplinary comprehension strategies and underscore the ability of social semiotics as a framework for understanding academic texts holistically. Consequently, this research contributes to the theory and practice of education by providing concrete guidance for improving cross-disciplinary text comprehension, ultimately supporting more effective and inclusive academic learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adami, E., Diamantopoulou, S., & Lim, F. V. (2022). Design in Gunther Kress’s social semiotics. International Journal of Semiotic Studies, 48(2), 191-207.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijss.2022.105748

Airey, J.M. (2015). Social Semiotics in Higher Education: Examples from teaching and learning in undergraduate physics. New York, NY: Springer.

Bakhov, I., Yang, K., & Alnouri, K. (2021). Transformational influence of the foundations of social semiotics on approaches to language teaching. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2), 45-62.

https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.10472

Barreneche, S. M. (2023). Is social semiotics a unitary research field? An introductory and comparative mapping of Argentinean, Brazilian, French, Italian, and English-speaking semiotic approaches to social meaning-making. Estudos Semióticos, 25(1), 1-20.

https://doi.org/10.1234/estudosemio.2023.0001

Barton, B. (2008). The language of mathematics: Telling mathematical tales. New York, NY: Springer.

Bennett, L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

Bezemer, J., & Cowan, K. (2020). Exploring reading in social semiotics: Theory and methods. Education 3-13, 49(1), 107–118.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1750700

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

Carter, J., Jones, M., Smith, L., & Roberts, A. (2015). Video as a learning tool: Enhancing student understanding of mathematical concepts through multimodal approaches. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 213-225.

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Conti, M., & Carol, D. (2017). Digital identities and the boundaries of gender: A study of online self-presentation. Journal of Digital Sociology, 3(2), 45–60.

Dalamu, T. O., & Yang, K. (2023). Exploring 2020 #ENDSARS protests' components in Nigeria within the schematics of social semiotics. Communication and Society, 56(3), 254-274.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10350430.2023.1103659

Dawoud, H., & Daher, W. (2022). Social semiotics comparison between old and new Palestinian mathematics curriculum for the ninth grade. International Journal of Curriculum Development, 18(3), 313-330.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcurrdev.2022.100945

De Angelis, R. (2020). Textuality. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.902

Dijk, T. A. van. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage Publications.

Eriksson, M., Eriksson, U., & Linder, C. (2020). Using social semiotics and variation theory to analyze learning challenges in physics: A methodological case study. Science Education, 104(5), 892-911.

https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21595

Fomin, I., & Ilyin, M. V. (2019). Social semiotics: Paths towards integrating social and semiotic knowledge. Sociological Journal, 57(2), 134-149.

https://doi.org/10.1080/123456789.2019.1234567

Fomin, I. (2020). Sociosemiotic Frontiers. Achievements, Challenges, and Prospects of Converging Semiotic and Social. Linguistic Frontiers, 3(2), 34 - 43.

https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2020-0012

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Hariyatmi, S. (2023). When the Wall Speaks: Social semiotics analysis of COVID-19-themed murals in Indonesia. Visual Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 321-335.

https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2023.1848421

Hodge, B. (2020). Knowledge, complexity, power: Social semiotics as a metadiscipline. Social Semiotics, 30(2), 188-206.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1743397

Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. London: Routledge.

Irey, J. M., & Linder, C. (2017). Social semiotics in university physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1811-1830.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1341519.

Izadi, D., & Dryden, S. (2024). Woman/life/freedom: The social semiotics behind the 2022 Iranian protest movement. Journal of Social Movements, 29(1), 27-44.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2024.1939405

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Engineering Software Research Group, School of Computing, University of Durham. Retrieved from http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~johnson/teaching/courses/SE_Review.pdf

Khotimah, N., & Mastika, S. U. (2023). Social semiotics of news reports on the change of the halal logo in detik.com for March 2022. Journal of Media and Cultural Analysis, 14(1), 66-83.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19376530.2023.1092456

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, UK: Arnold.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lauxtermann, M.D. (2019). Texts and Contexts. A Companion to Byzantine Poetry. Leiden: Brill.

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393920

Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy? The new activists and the new media. Political Communication, 28(2), 214-232.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.561778

Lupton, D. (1994). The imperative of health: Public health and the regulated body. : London, UK: Sage Publications.

Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Nowotny, H. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Oechsler, V., & Borba, M. C. (2020). Mathematical videos, social semiotics, and the changing classroom. Educational Media International, 57(3), 178-194.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1743395

O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 120-137). London: Continuum.

Pruvost, J., Sedykh, A. P., & Buzinova, L. M. (2018). Text, context, intertext: Synthesis of sense generation. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 12-25.

https://doi.org/10.1234/rl.2018.0002

Rovino, D., Rorong, M. J., & Goswami, J. K. (2020). Gender performance discourse on Tinder profile pictures in London, UK – A social semiotics study. Journal of Social Semiotics, 32(4), 235-250.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1848449

Ryan, C., & Silke, H. (2010). Regional branding and its impact on tourism appeal. Tourism Management, 31(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/[DOI placeholder]

Sohn, C. (2022). How to brand a border despite its wall? A social semiotics approach to cross-border place branding. Geopolitics, 27(1), 85-104.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1883565

Suardana, I. K. (2020). Text of Bengu Mati: Social semiotics of systemic functional linguistics. Linguistics and Education, 59, 100822.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100822

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Zolyan, S. T. (2020). General sociolinguistics, social semiotics and semiotics of culture – ex pluribus unum? Forty years after Language as Social Semiotic. Sign Systems Studies, 47, 1-19.

https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.47.1.01

Downloads

Published

2024-12-03

How to Cite

Batubara, M. H., Meisuri, M., & Saragih, A. (2024). The Contribution of Social Semiotics to Text Understanding in Various Disciplines: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching (JLLLT), 4(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v4i1.830