Exploring Digital Communication: Language Use by South African University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v4i2.854Keywords:
Social Media, Digital Communication, Language, Students, Cyber SocialisingAbstract
This study explores the use of language on social media. The researchers investigated the problems related to language that undergraduate students encounter when they socialize on cyber socializing platforms. The study also highlights the relationship between language and cyberbullying, incorporating AI tools used by cyber socializing platforms to explore their effectiveness in detecting improper linguistic communication on social media. The study employed a qualitative approach, which entailed semi-structured interviews to collect the desired data. Ten undergraduate students volunteered to be part of the interviews. The findings of this study showed that all 10 students encountered problems related to language, and for some students, these problems led to mental health issues. The following are some of the problems encountered by students when interacting on social media: slang, misinterpretation, grammar and spelling errors, informal language, fake news, language barriers, cyberbullying, discriminatory language, the difference between face-to-face communication and online communication, and AI tools such as natural language processing, having difficulties in detecting improper linguistic communication.
Downloads
References
Adedamola, A. A., Modupe, A., & Dehinbo, O. J. (2015). Development and evaluation of a system for normalizing internet slang in social media texts. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015 Vol I WCECS 2015, October 21-23, 2015, San Francisco, USA. https://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCECS2015/WCECS2015_pp418-423.pdf
Aichner, T., Grunfelder, M., Maurer, O., & Jegeni, D. (2021). Twenty-five years of social media: A review of social media applications and definitions from 1994 to 2019. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(4), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0134 215-222
Al-Ajlan, M., & Ykhlef, M. (2018). Optimized Twitter cyberbullying detection based on deep learning. Proceedings of the National Computing Conference, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/NCG.2018.8593146
Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research—Challenges and benefits. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 288–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p288
Al-Salman, S. M. (2017). Has the power of language been compromised by the influence of social media? Studies in English Language Teaching, 5(2), 172–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/selt.v5n2p172
Anderson, R. (2007). Thematic content analysis (TCA): Descriptive presentation of qualitative data. http://rosemarieanderson.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ThematicContentAnalysis.pdf
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R. et al. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 48, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1.
Ariantini, K. P., Suwastini, N. K. A., Adnyani, N. L. P. S., Dantes, R. G., & Jayantini, G. A. S. R. (2021). Integrating social media into English language learning: How and to what benefits according to recent studies. Nobel: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 12(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2021.12.1.91-111
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Bonvillain, N. (2020). Language, culture, & communication: The meaning of messages (8th ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Budiasa, I. G., Savitri, P. W., & Dewi, A. A. S. S. S. (2021). Slang language in Indonesian social media. Lingual: Journal of Language and Culture, 11(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.24843/ljlc.2021.v11.i01.p06
Clark, E., & Araki, K. (2011). Text normalization in social media: Progress, problems, and applications for a pre-processing system of casual English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 27(3), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.577
Çöltekin, C. (2020). A corpus of Turkish offensive language on social media. Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 6174–6184. Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.758/
Creswell, J. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dalvi, R., Chavan, S., & Halbe, A. (2020). Detecting Twitter cyberbullying using machine learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems, 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICCS48265.2020.9120893
Dawadi, S. (2020). Thematic Analysis Approach: A Step-by-Step Guide for ELT Research Practitioners. Journal of NELTA, 25(1-2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v25i1-2.49731.
Dhiman, B. (2023). Ethical issues and challenges in social media: A current scenario. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.22662844.v1
Driscoll, B. (2019). Book blogs as tastemakers. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 16(1), 280–305. https://www.participations.org/16-01-14-driscoll.pdf
Duarte, N., Llanso, E., & Loup, A. (2017). Mixed messages? The limits of automated social media content analysis. Center for Democracy and Technology.
Fleming, J., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2018). Methodologies, methods, and ethical considerations for conducting research in work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning. https://www.ijwil.org/files/IJWIL_19_3_205_213.pdf
Grant, T., & Macleod, N. (2016). Assuming identities online: Experimental linguistics applied to the policing of online pedophile activity. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 50–70. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1093/applin/amv079
Halcomb, E., & Hickman, L. (2015). Mixed methods research. Nursing Standard: Promoting Excellence in Nursing Care, 29(32), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.32.41.e8858
Kasavana, M., Nusair, K., & Teodosic, K. (2010). Online social networking: Redefining the human web. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 1(1), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/17579881011023025
Kim, S., Kimber, M., Boyle, M. H., & Georgiades, K. (2019). Sex differences in the association between cyberbullying victimization and mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation in adolescents. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry / La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 64(2), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743719825567
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., & Zickuhr, K. (2011). Teens, kindness, and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2011/11/09/teens-kindness-and-cruelty-on-social-network-sites/
Locher, M. A., & Bousfield, D. (2008). Introduction: Impoliteness and power in language. In Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 1-9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Magaldi, D., & Berler, M. (2020). Semi-structured interviews. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 2346-2352). Berlin: Springer.
Martinez-Monteagudo, M. C., Delgado, B., Diaz-Herrero, A., & Garcia-Fernandez, J. M. (2020). Relationship between suicidal thinking, anxiety, depression, and stress in university students who are victims of cyberbullying. Journal of Affective Disorders, 286, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.02.039
Mat Sood, S. M., Tan, K. H., & Abdul Hamid, B. (2020). Cyberbullying through intellect-related insults. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(1), 278-297. https://doi.org/10.17576/jk-2020-3601-15
Naylor, E., & Fellar, E. (2019). Cyberbullying: Harassment at your fingertips. Rhode Island Medical Journal, 102(9), 7-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31675779/
Nesi, J. (2020). The impact of social media on youth mental health: Challenges and opportunities. North Carolina Medical Journal, 81(2), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.81.2.116
Ortner, C., Sinner, P., & Jadin, T. (2018). The history of online social media. In N. Brügger & I. Milligan (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Web History (pp. 372-384). New York: SAGE Publications.
Pitsoe, V., & Letseka, M. (2013). Foucault’s discourse and power: Implications for instruction classroom management. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.31004
Rahman, M. S. (2016). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6, 102-112.
https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
Riger, S., & Sigurvinsdottir, R. (2016). Thematic analysis. In L. A. Jason & D. S. Glenwick (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (pp. 33–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rusli, M. F., Aziz, M. A., Aris, S. R. S., Jasri, N. A., & Maskat, R. (2018). Understanding Malaysian English (Manglish) jargon in social media. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 10(2S), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v10i2s.10
Subaramaniam, K., Kolandaisamy, R., Jalil, A. B., & Kolandaisamy, I. (2022). Cyberbullying challenges on society: A review. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 2174-2184. https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/1796/1013
Trimastuti, W. (2017). An analysis of slang words used in social media. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 64-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v5i2.497
Weiyan, L. (2015). A historical overview of uses and gratifications theory. Cross-Cultural Communication, 11(9), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.3968/7415
Wu, S., Lin, T., & Shih, J. (2017). Examining the antecedents of online disinhibition. Information Technology and People, 30(1), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2015-0167
Yosep, I., Hikmat, R., & Mardhiyah, A. (2023). Nursing intervention for preventing cyberbullying and reducing its negative impact on students: A scoping review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S400779
Zhong, J., Qiu, J., Sun, M., Jin, X., Zhang, J., Guo, Y., Qiu, X., Xu, Y., Huang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2022). To be ethical and responsible digital citizens or not: A linguistic analysis of cyberbullying on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 789-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107423
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tiyiselani Ndukwani, Shaun Livhuwani Muobeleheni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.