Language Model of Male and Female Students (Sociolinguistic Study)

Halimah Tussa’diah; Wulandari Siregar; Muhammad Hasyimsyah Batubara

doi:10.37249/jlllt.v2i1.529

Authors

Halimah Tussa’diah Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Wulandari Siregar IAIN Takengon, Aceh Tengah, Aceh, Indonesia
Muhammad Hasyimsyah Batubara IAIN Takengon, Aceh Tengah, Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v2i1.529

Keywords:

Language, Students, Sociolinguistics, Model, Male and Female

Abstract

This research discusses and raises the theme of studying the language model of male and female students in a sociolinguistic study. Language plays an important role in interaction and communication. Both male and female speakers have their speaking skills, especially on important matters. This research was conducted with a descriptive qualitative approach. In the steps to analyze the data, researchers used several stages such as data selection, data grouping, and concluding the data being analyzed. The language and conversation models between male and female students have fundamental differences. According to observations, female students seem more verbal than male students. Furthermore, the language of male students is more confrontational, informative, to the point, giving advice, sarcastic, and joking. Meanwhile, the language of female students is more supportive, giving and seeking understanding, using personal feelings, caring, togetherness, and being serious.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Halimah Tussa’diah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Wulandari Siregar, IAIN Takengon, Aceh Tengah, Aceh, Indonesia

Muhammad Hasyimsyah Batubara, IAIN Takengon, Aceh Tengah, Aceh, Indonesia

References

Bouchard, C., Cloutier, R., Gravel, F., & Sutton, Ann. (2008). The Role of Language Skills in Perceived Prosociality in Kindergarten Boys and Girls. European Journal of Development Psychology, 5(3), 338-357.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620600823744

Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex Differences in L2 Vocabulary Learning Strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00037

Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (1995). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2010). Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, A. (2014). Linguistik Umum. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Devitt, M. & Hanley, R. (2006). The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language. USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Easteal, P., Bartels, L., & Bradford, S. (2012). Language, Gender, and “Reality”: Violence Against Women. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 40(4), 324-337.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2012.05.001

Eckert, P., & Mcconnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461-488.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Think-Practically-and-Look-Locally%3A-Language-and-as-Eckert-Mcconnell-Ginet/54be03bda514b1ab7b3659d2f34c4882646797e4

Finocchiaro. (1974). English as A Second Language: From Theory to Practice. New York: Regent Publishing Company.

Gu, Lihong. (2013). Language and Gender: Differences and Similarities. International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities, and Management (ASSHM 2013). 248-251.

https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/asshm-13/10624

Herpanus, Tedi Suryadi, P. A. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa pada Surat Resmi di Desa Tanjung Sari Kecamatan Ketungau Tengah Kabupaten Sintang Periode Tahun 2015-2019. Jurnal Kansasi, 4(124–134).

https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/331190-analisis-kesalahan-berbahasa-pada-surat-0a316e1d.pdf

Hidayat, R.S. (2004). Penulisan & Gender. Makara Sosial Humaniora, 8(1), 9-15.

https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v8i1.73

Hudson, R.A. (1996). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ishak, N. A. M., Razali, S. N., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2022). Gender and the Use of English Language Among Form 3 Secondary School Students in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(3), 423–441.

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i3/14541

Keraf, G. (2005). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Khalida, N., Sholpan, Z., Bauyrzhan, B., & Ainash, B. (2013). Language and Gender in Political Discourse (Mass Media Interviews). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70 (2013), 417- 422.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.079

Klein, J. (1971). The family in "traditional" working-class England. In M. Anderson (Ed.), Sociology of the family. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin Books.

Kridalaksana, H. (1978). Sosiolinguistik dalam Leksikografi. Jakarta: Tugu, Panitia Penataran Leksikografi (Pusat Bahasa). Kridalaksana, H. (1984). Kamus Linguistik. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Kunjana, R. R. (2001). Sosiolinguistik Kode dan Alih Kode. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper & Row.

Mackey, W.F. (1986). Analisis Bahasa. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Malmkj?r, K. (2009). The Routledge Linguistics Encyclopedia 3rd Edition. New York: Routledge.

Mills, S. (1995). Feminist Stylistics. London: Routledge.

Moleong, L. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif . Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nababan. (1989). Sosiolinguistik dan Pengajaran Bahasa dalam PELLBA 2. Jakarta: Lembaga Bahasa Unika Atma Jaya.

Nawawi, H. & Martini, M. H. (1992). Instrumen Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Ohoiwutan, Paul. (1997). Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Kesaint Blant.

Pan, Q. (2011). On the Features of Female Language in English, Theory and Practice in Language Studies.

Retrieved from https: //doi:10.4304/tpls.1.8.1015-1018

Santoso, A. (2007). Beberapa Catatan Tentang Bahasa Perempuan: Perspektif Wacana Kritis. Diksi Jurnal ilmiah Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya.14(2), 111-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v14i2.6593

Setyadi, R., & Ekawati, R. (2021). Male And Female Language Features In A Star Is Born Movie. Parafrase: Jurnal Kajian Kebahasaan & Kesastraan, 21(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.30996/parafrase.v21i1.4688

Setyoriny, W. (2006). Ragam Bahasa Pria dan Wanita Ditinjau dari Penggunaan Shuujoshi. Tesis. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Smith & Hefner, N. (1988). Women and Politeness: the Javanese Example. Language in Society, 17(5), 535-554.

doi:10.1017/S0047404500013087

Speer, Susan. (2002). Sexist Talk: Gender Categories, Participant Orientations and Irony. Journal Of Sosiolinguistics, 6(3), 347-377.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00192

Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford introductions to language study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Syafrizal, S., & Putri, F. S. (2020). A Linguistic Politeness: An Analysis Of Gender Differences In Speaking Classroom. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 5(2), 169-178.

https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v5i2.14436

Tannen, D. (1990). Gender differences in conversational coherence: Physical alignment and topical cohesion. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 167–206). Ablex Publishing.

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-98125-007

Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, Covert Prestige and Linguistic Change in the Urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1(1), 79-95.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000488

Vanfossen, Beth. (2001). Soziales Vorurteil und Kommunikation. Frankfurt am Main: Differences in Communication. ITROW’s Women and Expression Conference. Athenaum.

Wardhaugh, R. (1988). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Basi Blackwell.

Wibowo, W. (2001). Manajemen Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Wijana, I. D. P. (2006). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.