THE ANALYSIS ON BACKGROUND, ORGANIZING PRINCIPLE, AND TYPE OF SYLLABUS ON ENGLISH COURSEBOOK ENGLISH IN FOCUS
Keywords:English Language Syllabus, Critical Analysis, English Language Education
This research tries to look closely at the background, organizing principle, and how the English in Focus coursebook is designed. To figure out the answer, the research employs a qualitative study with a descriptive approach. The book itself is analyzed by using three parameters set by Canale and Swain, namely 1. The background, 2.Organizing principle, and 3.Type of the syllabus. The research has found that the book is designed to be used in a target-removed context in the EFL context. Furthermore, the book follows the functional/notional syllabus. The conceptualization of language is designed to follow communicative functions, incorporating Canale and Swain's language model involving linguistic, discourse socio-cultural, and strategic components. Following that, the book integrates other syllabus strands. The functional approach is shown by different language functions presented to students, while the discourse syllabus is realized in the speech acts involving politeness and formal and informal language. The structural syllabus is indicated by the grammar items to be learned by students inductively. However, some issues should be addressed in the book. The strategic competence that underlies the syllabus is limitedly realized in the classroom activities. In this case, the books should consider the tasks that enable students to develop their skills in avoiding communication breakdowns such as turn-taking and repair.
Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (2004). The functional analysis of English. London: Hodder Education.
Breen, M. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. London: Cambridge University Press.
Breen, M. P. &Candlin, C. N. (2001). The essential of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Oxon: Routledge.
Burn, A. (2001). A genre-Based approach to writing and beginning adult ESL learners. English language teaching in its social context. London: Routledge.
Carless, D. R. (2001). A case study of curriculum implementation in Hong Kong. In DR Hall and A Hewings (Eds.), Innovation in English language teaching. Oxon: Routledge.
Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in Genre-Based approaches. London: Hodder Education.
Ellis, R. (2002). New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms. Marwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Freeman, Y & Freeman, D. (1998). ESL/EFL teaching: principles for success. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: an advanced resource book. Abingdon: Routledge.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Graves, K. (2008). The language curriculum: a social-contextual perspective. London: Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Hedge, T. (2003). Grammar. Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxon: Routledge.
Hill, K. (2009). Self and peer assessment and assessment of young learners. Melbourne: Deakin University.
Kostogriz, A. (2010). Course development process: a summary of week 1-5. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
Lewis, M. (2001). Lexis in the syllabus. Oxon: Routledge.
Lin, B. (2002). English as an international language: discourse as an answer to what to teach & how to teach it. Conference Proceeding of The 7th Annual Conference Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics.1-16.
Markee, N. (2001). The diffusion of innovation in language teaching. In DR Hall and A Hewings (Eds.), Innovation in English language teaching. Oxon: Routledge.
McNamara, T. F. (1998). Policy and social considerations in language assessment. In DR Hall and A Hewings (Eds.), Innovation in English language teaching. Oxon: Routledge.
McCarthy, M. & Carter (2001). Designing the discourse syllabus. Oxon: Routledge.
McKay, S. L. (2003). EIL curriculum development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. & Lamb, C. (2001). Managing the learning process. Oxon: Routledge.
Nunan, D. (2001). Teaching grammar in context. In Candlin& N Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context. London: Routledge.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Course planning and syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, L. (2005). Washback and impact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.